The United Kingdom has faced intense scrutiny, particularly from African nations, following Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s cabinet reshuffle in October 2023. All eyes were on Suella Braverman, the former Home Secretary, to see if she would retain her position in Sunak’s new cabinet or face dismissal. Unlike in previous reshuffles, Braverman was unable to escape the axe this time around.

Suella Braverman, a British politician, was a staunch advocate for stricter immigration controls. She was a strong proponent of the “Stop the Boats” campaign, which aimed to deter illegal immigration and protect the UK’s borders. Her policies, however, attracted significant criticism for being inhumane and ineffective.

The Rwanda Plan and the Supreme Court Ruling

In April 2022, Braverman, then Home Secretary, introduced a controversial policy bill to Parliament. The bill proposed that asylum seekers arriving in the UK through small boats across the English Channel would be deported to Rwanda for processing. This policy, known as the Rwanda plan, drew widespread criticism from human rights groups, legal experts, and opposition politicians.

Despite the initial setbacks, Braverman and the Conservative government persisted with their appeal, taking the case to the UK’s Supreme Court. However, Braverman’s tenure as Home Secretary was abruptly cut short when Prime Minister Rishi Sunak decided to replace her. She was not present to witness the Supreme Court’s ruling.

In a landmark ruling in June 2023, the UK’s Supreme Court unanimously declared that the government’s plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. The five justices presiding over the case found that the policy exposed asylum seekers to a “real risk” of being sent back to their home countries, where they could face persecution or violence.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak addressed the public and the press. He announced plans to introduce emergency legislation to confirm Rwanda as a safe country for asylum seekers. He stated that he would not allow foreign courts to obstruct the government’s efforts to deter illegal immigration.

According to a BBC News report, a number of senior Conservative members, including former Prime Minister Theresa May, opposed the Rwanda plan. May criticized the policy, stating that it would not effectively address the issue of illegal migration. She also questioned the detention of asylum seekers for 28 days and the “inadmissible” designation of their asylum claims. The Rwanda plan sparked debates on social media, with many questioning the policy’s fairness and effectiveness. Some individuals also drew parallels between Sunak and Braverman’s policies and their ancestral ties to the countries they were seeking to restrict access to.

Conclusion

The UK’s Rwanda plan remains a contentious issue, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate. The policy’s legality and effectiveness continue to be challenged, highlighting the complexities of addressing illegal immigration while upholding human rights principles.